ZN414 AM Receiver IC

T092 package at left used for ZN414Z, YS414,MK414 and TA7642. T018 package at right is used for the original ZN414.

History of the ZN414.
From the mid 1970's onwards, if you wanted to build a simple AM radio, chances are the circuit you would use was based around the ZN414.
The design of this TRF radio IC, well known to European and Australasian constructors of radio receivers, was commenced in November 1970 by Ferranti in the UK. It was designed using new Collector Diffusion Isolation techniques, originally developed by the Bell Laboratories. A prototype was working in July 1971.

Originally, it came in a TO18 package, like a BC108 transistor, but the last of the IC's were made in a T092 plastic case, as the ZN414Z. There are only three connections; input from a ferrite rod aerial, earth and audio output. The circuit is a TRF type with all gain at the received frequency. The IC also incorporates a detector and AGC circuit. Supply is a nominal 1.5V at 300uA and audio output is sufficient to drive a crystal earphone. Needless to say, it became very popular for matchbox size radios in the 1970's. So popular was the ZN414 in the UK, that it eventually killed off the one and two transistor reflex circuits which used to regularly appear in their constructional magazines. No doubt, Clive Sinclair would have been delighted if such an IC was around when his key ring Micromatic (two transistor AM reflex) receiver was being developed.

Eventually, Ferranti went the way of many semiconductor companies, and the ZN414/ZN415/ZN416 were no longer being produced. However, all was not lost as the Asian manufacturers had cloned it under a number of different types. First was the YS414 and then came the MK484, LMF501T, TA7642, and various other xx7642 types. The MK484 and TA7642 are now the most common types.

From Wireless World, January 1973, this shows the inside of the ZN414.

The first magazine project to use the ZN414 was in Practical Wireless, January 1973. This was a receiver built as a key ring radio, and used the ZN414 in its most basic form. Output was used to drive a crystal earphone directly. The battery was a mercury button cell.

Circuit from PW, January 1973 is the most basic possible.

Subsequently, in February 1973, Practical Electronics described a full size loudspeaking portable set, the "P.E. Triffid". This article contains an interesting history regarding the design of the ZN414, and was compiled by an employee of Ferranti who was involved with the design. Therefore, anyone working with the ZN414 would be wise to read this article several times and take note of the points brought up.

Electronics Australia, May 1974.
In Australia, the first project description of a ZN414 receiver was in Electronics Australia, May 1974. It drove low impedance headphones via a transformer.

Note that a fixed 1K resistor is shown as the load for the ZN414. The article pointed out that some adjustment might be required. The transformer is a valve output type 5K to 15 ohms.

Electronics Australia, August 1979.
Then in August 1979, Electronics Australia presented a circuit driving a low impedance earphone via a transistor. For this design, the load resistor has now been made variable. In the following issue was a two transistor audio amplifier add on.

Electronics Australia, July 1985
Next in line for EA's ZN414 projects was a receiver designed for long wave weather beacons, operating around 370Kc/s. The ZN414 circuit is conventional, but the audio amplifier is excessively complicated. One wonders why the op-amp was bothered with - they could have used an LM386 instead and dispensed with the four extra transistors.

Electronics Australia "Weather Radio" from July 1985.

Electronics Australia, February 1986.  Performance breakthrough!
This project called the "AM3" was presented by Technicraft, a small supplier of mostly radio based kits in the mid 1980's. It seems that for the first time, someone had actually examined the limitations of the IC, and its AGC system with strong signals, and done something about it. The circuit was an instant success when I tried it, and all subsequent ZN414 circuits in Electronics Australia (September 1987 - Switched tuned receiver in cassette box [note this particular circuit has the 100K shunting the aerial coil - bad design]), and Silicon Chip (September 1994 -Weather Radio) have used it. Surprisingly, outside Electronics Australia and Silicon Chip readers, the new circuit is still unknown, and the rest of the world battles on with the limitations of the original circuit oblivious to the improvement possible. Having said that, the original circuit is acceptable provided you're not in a strong signal area.

The AM3 receiver at left. At right is the basic circuit with full control of the AGC. The load resistance is now no longer critical.

The modification provides the greatest possible range of control, and one benefit was that the load resistor was now no longer critical. It can be seen that the bias fed into the ZN414 input is fully adjustable from zero volts to the voltage at the output terminal. The value of the potentiometer is not critical and can be between 10K and 100K.

The full AM3 circuit. Q1 is an emitter follower to drive the headphones. Q2 is the power switch that detects whether or not the headphones are plugged in. D1 is for temperature stabilisation.

Unfortunately, the TA7642 does not work effectively with this method of gain control. The TA7642 is not an identical ZN414 clone, and this is discussed further on.

Electronics Australia, September 1987
This design was a switch tuned radio designed to fit into a cassette case. It uses the new improved gain control circuit. Unfortunately, the designer has made the mistake of connecting the 100K resistor so it shunts the tuned circuit. While the DC conditions will be correct, the aerial coil now has reduced Q and selectivity suffers. The method of biassing the output transistor is extremely crude, and unlikely to give optimum results.


Easy Electronics, Number 1, "Mouse"
This short lived Australian magazine from 1976 described a ZN414 receiver with one transistor driving an earphone.

As can be imagined by the high value of bias resistor for the BC108, it was intended to drive a high impedance magnetic earphone. The resistor would need to be reduced for lower impedance phones, and a collector load resistor provided if a crystal earphone was used. The two diodes are not given a type number, but are merely described as "signal diodes". One could assume they are germanium types such as 0A91. Two silicon types would stop the circuit working. These diodes were recommended if there were signs of instability, and simply reduce the supply voltage.

Funway 1 "Beer Powered Radio"
In 1980, Dick Smith Electronics had first published their "Funway Into Electronics" series of project books. There were three volumes, with the first containing a series of projects built on a piece of chipboard. Subsequent volumes described more complex projects built on printed circuit boards.
In Volume 1, project 14 describes a beer powered radio. The idea is that beer performs as the electrolyte of a simple battery. Interestingly, with the "beer battery", no load resistor is used with the ZN414; presumably the internal resistance of the battery is sufficient.
An option was shown to power the radio off a normal 9V battery. Here we see something different. Instead of a 1.5V regulator, the load resistor is simply increased to 33K to allow 9V operation. The technique certainly appears to work, and the cheap commercially made radios of today, operating off 3V, use the same technique - see the Future Kit further down.

Operating a ZN414 off 9V is shown in project 14 of Funway Into Electronics. The earphone is a crystal type.

Funway 2 "Pocket Transistor Radio".
In "Funway Into Electronics", Volume 2, was the "Pocket Transistor Radio" which drove an 8 ohm magnetic earphone and ran off a 9V battery. Its performance was very poor for two reasons. Firstly, the method of obtaining the supply for the ZN414 was a bodge and resulted in instability, and secondly, the 9V battery pressed up against the ferrite rod ruined the signal pickup. This particular circuit was the same as EA's August 1979 design, except for the 9V modification. This was actually my first experience with the ZN414. Back in 1981 when I built this kit, I had very little idea what was going on, so merely followed the instructions and built up the radio as described.

At left is my version with decent headphones. At right is the circuit of the Funway 2 radio circuit. Unfortunately, it's a bodge and performance is poor.

Apart from the zener diode and 9V battery, the circuit is conventional and commonly used. The ZN414 is connected as per the data sheet. Output at pin 1 then feeds a DS548 (BC548) transistor as a class A earphone driver. TR1 bias comes from the voltage at pin pin 1 as its DC coupled. Collector current will therefore depend on the setting of the 5K pot, signal strength, and R3. Current is [Vpin1 - .6]/100.
C3 reduces audio degeneration and loss of gain. I have seen some circuits on the internet which are similar, but the transistor base is AC coupled and biassed with a single resistor from the collector. The emitter resistor retained in these circuits is pointless, (unless it is unbypassed for reducing audio gain) as there is no resistor from base to ground. It's amazing how many badly designed circuits abound on the internet and other places.
Having assembled the kit, performance was unacceptable. It had terrible instability and low volume. Back then, I didn't understand zener diodes and thought the power supply was a bit strange. I did know the ZN414 was meant to run on 1.5V, however. So, I tried powering it off an AA cell instead and that immediately cleared up the instability. My suspicion was right; something strange with the 9V battery and the zener diode. In retrospect, there's two faults with the design. As it is, there will actually be 2.2V across C4, not 1.5V. And this will be even higher with a new 9V battery. Definitely outside the ZN414 ratings! Assuming we got the correct 1.5V across C4 by using a 7.5V zener diode instead, there are still two remaining deficiencies. First, it's incredibly wasteful. Given the cost of 9V batteries, 5/6 of what you're paying for is going up as heat from the zener diode and contributing nothing. Five out of the six cells are effectively being wasted. The second fault is that battery life will be much less than when a single 1.5V cell is used to power the circuit. Why is this so? As we know, battery voltage starts dropping as soon as we start using it. As a rule of thumb, something designed for a 9V battery should work down to about 7.5V, giving an acceptable life. If we apply that principle here, we will see that it won't take long for this kind of drop in battery voltage to kill off the supply altogether. Yet, the individual cells in the 9V battery would still be capable of powering the radio directly.

Inside the set with AAA cell fitted. The ZN414 is visible next to the tuning condenser.

The reason for this bodge? Back in 1980, Dick Smith did not sell single AA or AAA battery holders, and a 9V battery was the only thing with a connector that would fit in the preferred box.
The 9V battery approach could have actually been done to advantage. Firstly, the ZN414 should have been powered as per the Hobby Electronics circuit (see below) with a series resistor and shunt regulator diodes. The 9V battery will last a very long time with this configuration; probably longer than if one of the individual cells was used directly. Secondly, the full 9V could have been used for the audio stage, and with a transformer to match the earphone impedance. This would provide more gain and volume.
For my version of this project, I eventually installed a AAA battery, of which the holder only just fits the box. The low volume was, not surprisingly, a result of an 8R earphone being provided with the kit. As I dislike those white low impedance earphones provided with transistor radios up until the 1980's, I installed a 3.5mm stereo socket for proper 32R Walkman headphones. Most ZN414 circuits that use these recommend the earphones be connected in series  to increase the impedance to 64R instead of 16R, which is what you'd get connecting them in parallel. While the higher impedance allows greater volume, the problem is that the two transducers are out of phase giving a peculiar and unnatural sound. I prefer the correct in phase connection instead despite loss of gain.  It is true that you could connect them in series and in phase by cutting off the plug and accessing the individual transducer connections.
I have a few sets of these headphones, but two of which I discovered are of higher impedance (about 250R per transducer). These are the headphones provided in aircraft for passenger use. With a set of my Qantas headphones plugged in, this receiver really became alive with good volume and excellent bass response. With the normal 32R headphones, the Sydney stations were just audible 80km from their transmitters, but with the 250R units, volume became acceptable. Near the centre of Sydney, about 10km from the transmitters, there is more than enough volume on all stations. I would be hesitant to recommend speaker use without further stages.
The other modification I did to the kit was replace the 5K trim pot with a panel mounted switch pot. This gives a good range of adjustment for the AGC. DSE's idea of only needing to set the pot once shows how unfamiliar the kit designer was with the ZN414.  Additionally, the 1K resistor was reduced to 470R as this is the value shown in the data sheets, and 1K just did not allow full performance to be attained. Maybe ZN414's are not all the same, and some would have been satisfactory with 1K.
The performance of this radio has been drastically improved with these mods. Even in Sydney a few km from the 5kw transmitters at Homebush, I can receive some interstate stations at night, including 2XL, 2GN, and 2AY. The old 1224 2WS transmitter (now 2RPH) at Prospect can now be received without interference from 1170 2CH or 1269 2SM.
Interestingly, this design has been copied by a U.S. based kit supplier, complete with zener diode bodge.

Hobby Electronics, July 1981.

This circuit is from one of ETI's spin offs; Hobby Electronics, July 1981. This is the one shown here in the prototype photo. It can receive interstate stations at night with no external aerial or earth. The only limit to performance is the quality of the tuned circuit. Note the method used to obtain the 1.4V supply. My unit actually uses a YS414.

Electronics Today International, March 1987.
In the 1980's, two more versions of the IC appeared in an 8pin DIL package. These were the ZN415 and ZN416 and were simply a ZN414 with an audio stage capable of driving low impedance headphones. No doubt these versions were developed as the Walkman style of headphones were now in vogue. Apart from being much more comfortable, the sound quality and hygiene aspects far surpass the single magnetic or crystal earphones which until now had been standard with transistor radios. This article described a kit sold by Dick Smith, and is the only magazine project I have seen in Australia using the ZN415.

It looks like Ferranti had no intention of making Ragc adjustable. However, one could alter the supply voltage instead. If the resistor needed to be reduced, one could parallel an external resistor between pins 6 and 2. The IC would also be adaptable to the Technicraft method of gain control by ignoring pin 8, connecting C1 instead to the pot wiper. The gain control would be fed from pin 2.

Silicon Chip, September 1994, "Weather Radio".

The connection between Silicon Chip and Electronics Australia is evident, with this design using the Technicraft method of gain control. The overall design is better than EA's "Weather Radio" but the lack of bias for the output transistors is not something I'm keen on. Admittedly, the design was meant for voice only. The ZN414 output bypass being only .033uF is curious.

Silicon Chip, January 2012, "Build an AM Radio".

This design again uses the Technicraft method of gain control. However, in this instance the control is preset. Unfortunately, this will prevent the best performance being obtained as the receiver is tuned across the band. I would recommend a conventional potentiometer accessible to the user instead. The .018uF capacitor on the MK484 output is much lower than the recommended .1uF, and this could cause problems with stability. The 10R resistor would be superfluous and have no effect on anything. LED2 & LED3 are actually infra red types, simply used for voltage stabilisation. LED1 is a power on and battery condition indicator.
It is interesting to note that Silicon Chip also found the selectivity of the TA7642 inferior to the MK484. See notes further down.

Future Kit MK484 kit.

This was bought on ebay from "Future Kit" in Thailand. The circuit is largely conventional, with the main difference being the use of an oscillator coil instead of the usual ferrite loopstick. This makes for a very compact receiver, but a short wire aerial is required. To operate from 3V, the MK484 load resistor is 4.7K. Unfortunately, there is no provision to adjust this, so performance may not be optimum. In the example I bought, the receiver was unstable at 3V, but worked quite well at 1.5V.
There is a mistake in the circuit diagram in that there is a 150R emitter resistor for TR1, which has not been shown. The "speaker" supplied is not a speaker as shown on the above diagram, but one of those awful earbuds. 2SC458's are used for the transistors, but one could use BC548's or similar if duplicating the circuit. The IC supplied with the kit as purchased was a TA7642.

It is interesting to note that transistor MW coils have been standardised for some time. Red is usually the oscillator coil, and yellow designates one of the IF transformers. As can be seen, the coil supplied is yellow. As it turned out the inductance of this coil could not cover the entire broadcast band. The inductance is insufficient. With maximum tuning capacitance, the lowest receivable frequency was 920Kc/s, with the trimmer fully closed. The upper limit was around 2Mc/s. With the oscillator section paralleled, the range was 760Kc/s to 1950Kc/s.
The receiver works better with a ferrite loopstick aerial with the correct inductance.
See my construction of the kit here.

The quality of Future Kit designs seems to be questionable, as this FM receiver shows.

Distant Relations to the ZN414.

The LM372.
Prior to the ZN414, the U.S, National Semiconductor company had developed their LM372 in the late 60's. This IC was rather obscure and seemed to disappear very quickly.
Functionally, this is a very similar IC to the ZN414. However, it has a low input impedance, requiring a tapping on the aerial coil when used for a TRF receiver, and runs off a higher supply voltage. The LM372 has a gain of about 60dB (slightly less than the ZN414), is in a different package, and has more of its internal circuitry available to the outside world. It was intended to be used as an IF amplifier/detector, but Electronics Australia published a TRF circuit with it operating in the broadcast band, fed from a ferrite rod aerial, as one would with a ZN414. A later project saw it used in a 27Mc/s superhet remote control receiver.

Was National Semiconductor's LM372 a source of inspiration for Ferranti? This circuit was described in Electronics Australia, April 1969.

Wireless World TRF design.
An interestingly possible source of inspiration for Ferranti to design the ZN414 was a circuit published in Wireless World for October 1966, and presented locally by Electronics Australia the following month. This used a chain of directly coupled transistors fed from an aerial coil. If one incorporated an emitter follower input circuit to provide the necessary high input impedance, and replaced the diode with a transistor detector, the circuit would become rather similar to the internal workings of the ZN414.

This circuit, originally from Wireless World, October 1966, and shown here in an article from Electronics Australia, November 1966, bears more of a resemblance to the internal workings of the ZN414, and also works from 1.5V.  This circuit has been tested and works well. An extra transistor will give good volume into an 8 ohm speaker.

Where is the ZN414 used?
Strangely, it had taken about 35 years for this IC to really take off outside the world of British and Australian electronics magazines. Until recently it was one of these IC's like the TDA7000 (and its clones) that never seemed to be used in commercially made equipment. One would only see them in the pages of electronics magazines or in kits. The thing that has revived it, and the TDA70xx FM IC's, has been the proliferation of very cheap miniature radios. These are the type of pocket radio you see in $2 shops and typically run off 2 AAA cells. Some have an internal speaker, but most are earphone only. Obviously, someone along the way had realised that it would be far cheaper to produce radios using these IC's which had been used by hobbyists for so long, rather than a whole heap of discrete components and IF transformers. The alignment procedure is also dispensed with, further lowering costs. I have never seen a commercially made radio using an actual ZN414; all the ones I know of use the later clones.

This cheap pocket AM/FM radio uses a TA7642. It can be seen to the upper right of the 8 pin audio IC. With such a small ferrite loopstick sensitivity is poor.

About the ZN414 and its clones.

At this point it is worthwhile downloading the data sheets. Search for data on not just the ZN414, but the other clones as well.

Briefly, the tuned circuit is fed straight into the IC. There is no need for a tapped coil due to the 4M input impedance. Looking at the internal diagram of the TA7642, we can see this is a result of using an emitter follower at the input pin. Four stages of amplification and an active detector result in a gain of about 72dB which is high enough to give good results with no external aerial. In fact, gain is not too far off an average superhet using the same size aerial rod. The .1uF at the output pin is for RF bypassing, and in conjunction with Ragc, determines the audio bandwidth. The data sheet shows how this capacitor value is calculated. Apparently, the higher the value, the more gain can be had. This would make sense as RF bypassing would be improved with an increase in capacitance value.
The DC at the output pin varies with signal strength and this is used for AGC. The 100K and .01uF are the usual time constant to remove audio fluctuations. In addition, the .01uF is also the RF bypass for the earthy end of the aerial coil and tuning condenser. Gain of the IC is thus controlled by the DC at the input pin.
There are some circuits incorrectly drawn, particularly with the LMF501T clone, where the 100K has been connected directly to the input pin, along with the .01uF for DC isolation of the aerial coil. While this would work, and the DC conditions are correct, the problem is 100K is effectively shunted across the aerial coil. This will result in loss of gain and selectivity.
It is important that the tuned circuit is the only thing connected to the input pin. Be careful deviating from the standard input circuit. I once tried a circuit with a regenerative RF amplifier to feed the input of a ZN414. The RF amplifier output was fed into the ZN414 via a capacitor somewhere between 100pF and 1000pF. The input pin DC conditions were maintained with the usual 100K resistor. Because the RF amplifier had DC present on its output, the pulse of current through the capacitor as it charged up was enough to destroy the ZN414 with its high impedance input. It's probably best to keep to using an RF transformer to maintain isolation with such circuits.

Basic connections for the ZN414. This is the "bare minimum" circuit.

The power supply is one of the most attractive features for portable or miniature receivers. Only one 1.5V cell is required, and in its most basic form driving a crystal or high impedance earphone, current consumption is only 300uA. This makes operation from even the smallest cell possible. Voltage is however critical and Ragc may need to be changed for best results. Typically, 500R to 1.5K are shown on most circuits. Various stabilised and adjustable supplies are shown on the data sheets for use when the receiver needs to be powered from other sources; e.g. 9V. Note that the Ferranti application circuit shown above uses a 1.3V supply - this suggests they had intended the ZN414 to operate from a single mercury cell.

The official operating frequency of the ZN414 and clones is 150Kc/s to 3Mc/s. From articles in the English magazine, "Radio and Electronics Constructor", it appears the gain falls off in the longwave band. It was recommended only if Radio 2 (BBC long wave transmitter in the UK) gave a good signal in the area where the radio was to be used. However, both Electronics Australia (July 1985) and Silicon Chip (September 1994) described radios for the reception of the long wave weather beacons located at various Australian airports. This, and my own experiments seem to infer the ZN414 does a good job below the broadcast band.
As for the upper frequency limit, while 3Mc/s is the official cut off, many stories exist of reception higher into the SW bands, up to around 6 Mc/s. This cannot be guaranteed, and would be dependent on individual IC's and signal strength.
Of course, it doesn't have to be an aerial coil that feeds the input of the ZN414; it can just as well be the secondary of an IF transformer. This means that by using the ZN414 as an IF amplifier/detector, normal superhet techniques can be used to cover frequencies well outside the 150Kc/s-3Mc/s band. Examples are given in the data sheets on how to do this.
There are also circuits with regeneration applied. Given that the RF bypassing at the output pin is not perfect, some of the RF can be fed back into another winding on the aerial coil.
Other circuits show an external Q multiplier.

My use of the ZN414.
For years I had seen the ZN414 circuit from EA May 1974 in the back of the Dick Smith catalog, and the ads for the device proclaimed such virtues as "equivalent to a ten transistor radio". Ten transistors it may have, but it actually has only four stages of RF amplification. This is about the practical limit before instability would set in. The other transistors are used for the detector, AGC, impedance matching, and stabilisation. I had also seen the ZN414 project in the August 79 issue of Electronics Australia.

My first experience with it was with the Funway circuits in 1981. The "Funway 2" circuit was a failure as previously described, but the beer powered radio operating off 9V seemed OK. I then forgot about it until the mid 80's when I was learning about solid state. I experimented with many different ZN414 circuits and associated audio amplifiers. I used to demonstrate to some of my fellow college students a ZN414 receiver with a two transistor amplifier driving a speaker that I'd build on a breadboard from time to time.  Soon after, I went off listening to AM as a result of changes to formats and stations migrating to FM. So, the ZN414 became dormant in my designs until later, now that I'm mainly listening to AM again.
Also was the fact I'd accumulated a few of the $2 shop radios using the ZN414 clones.
My interest was rekindled when Dick Smith Electronics was selling MK484's at half price, just before they closed all their electronics stores.  I went and stocked up with a lifetime supply, knowing that at the time they were getting out of components retailing. Later on, with cheap TA7642's on ebay, I stocked up on those too.

Being a TRF circuit with selectivity determined only by the one tuned circuit, sound quality is excellent. It is certainly up to the standard for feeding into a hi fi amplifier and decent speaker system. As I've said elsewhere on the site, if people heard wideband AM through a good sound system, it wouldn't have the poor reputation it has unjustly suffered.
However, this and the limited AGC can be a problem in strong signal areas. Here, selectivity becomes poor. When I was still living in Sydney not too far from the transmitters, I had difficulty receiving 2WS on 1224 as it was a weak western suburbs station. The problem was 1170 2CH and 1269 2SM being much more powerful in my area. So, a DX receiver it was not! Nevertheless, I did try the Funway 2 receiver in a car and bus with good results.
The problem was the AGC system cannot cope with strong signals. One can of course attenuate them by using a smaller ferrite rod (compromise) or by turning the receiver away from the interfering stations (may not be convenient). At home in the mid Blue Mountains, about 70km away from the AM transmitters at Homebush, performance is very good with selectivity about the same as a valve TRF set. I can receive 2LT (Lithgow) without any interference from 2GB(Sydney) and yet the stations are only 27Kc/s apart. At night, the usual interstate stations are received.
Many designs allowed the supply voltage to be adjustable, as this is actually quite critical and has a large effect on receiver performance. This was done either by making Ragc partially variable or by adjusting the supply to the usual fixed Ragc. This helped, but wasn't as good as the breakthrough developed by Technicraft, in their article printed in Electronics Australia for February 1986, described above.

The TA7642.
In the present day, the TA7642 has dominated the ZN414 clones. However, it is important to note that it is not an exact equivalent. Yes, it will drop into a ZN414 circuit and produce results, but performance is quite different. Experiments show inferior selectivity, even when using the Technicraft method of gain control. It is interesting that the quoted input resistance is 3M for the TA7642 and 4M for the ZN414. The TA7642 goes into overload more abruptly than the ZN414, and the optimum Ragc (the load resistor) seems to be higher than the ZN414.
Types MK484 and YS414 are identical to the ZN414 in terms of performance and can be regarded as a direct equivalent. The problems with the TA7642 are further described in the article for the Future Kit AM Receiver.

Internal circuit of the TA7642 which presumably is similar, but not identical to the ZN414. Note the emitter follower input allowing direct connection to an aerial coil without tappings.

While the MK484 is still available, it appears this is old stock. It is more expensive than the TA7642. At some point tests will be done to see if it is possible to find suitable operating conditions for the TA7642 to make it perform as well as the ZN414.

ZN414 on the internet.
First point of call on the internet is to look at European sites, particularly British and European ones; use google.co.uk and google.de. Search under all the different type numbers. From Japan (google.jp), LMF501T, MK484, and TA7642 will provide more search results than ZN414.
In the U.S, the ZN414 went largely ignored, along with most other European semiconductors . In recent years a few kits and designs have started to appear there, no doubt as a result of being sourced from Asia where the later clones are popular. The ZN414, or more often now, the MK484 or TA7642, appears in many beginners kits, often with an LM386 to drive a speaker. Other kits have a one or two transistor amplifier driving earphones. One novel kit (the Future Kit described previously) uses a transistor radio local oscillator coil as the aerial coil, fed with a short piece of wire for an aerial. This is quite in order given the similar inductance.
While the ZN414 is no longer produced, the MK484 is still available and the TA7642 is currently quite plentiful, and a good deal cheaper. I purchased a packet of 50 for only $5 on ebay. One single ZN414 was not much cheaper, when it was available.

Using the ZN414.
Considering the amount of gain, it is a forgiving IC as far as construction methods go. It is possible to build ZN414 circuits on a solderless breadboard and get good results, but like any RF circuit, performance will be better if component leads are kept short, a ground plane is used, etc. One point mentioned in the data is that the output bypass condenser  should be as close as possible to the IC. It is interesting to note that although the data sheets show the AGC bypass as .01uF, many circuits have used .1uF, possibly as a result of incorrectly reading the data sheet. The increase in AGC time constant would not be noticeable, and if anything, the RF bypassing would be better.
While the typical ferrite rod and plastic dielectric tuning condenser as used in modern radios work well enough, an aerial coil wound with Litz wire and an air dielectric tuning condenser will improve Q and selectivity. Also, a longer ferrite rod improves signal pickup and directional qualities. Don't mount the ferrite rod near anything metallic, and make sure any metallic clamps for the aerial coil don't form a shorted turn. A good aerial makes all the difference, and in this regard I tried a tuned loop aerial inductively coupled to the Funway 2 radio.
Performance was nothing short of remarkable. Late afternoon in the Blue Mountains, 80km west of Sydney, I was clearly receiving stations such as 2NM, 2ST, 2TM, 2GN, 2AD with very good reception. By dusk, 4ZR was coming in very strongly. In fact, performance appeared to be of superhet quality. The tuned loop I used was a Tecsun AN-100. This has a provision for direct connection to the loop, but for this experiment I did not use it.

Tuned loop aerial provides spectacular performance.