AM/FM Tuner Amplifier

This is the first project to use my 6CM5/EL36 output stage design; having previously only tested it at an academic level.
Having rearranged my entertainment unit there was some space to be filled; and I had wanted a tuner/amp in that room for some time; hence the excuse to build this project.
It was an opportune time to use my 6CM5 amplifier circuit as I'd discovered I'd had some power transformers that could provide the necessary heater current.

The Amplifier
I won't repeat too much of what I've already said here (server space is starting to thin out a bit now); but essentially I've used the same as the prototype circuit and it did in fact work first time with no problems. The full details of my design are here. Instead of the 6AV6 preamp, I decided to try a VR100 (remote cut off G style pentode similar to 6U7), as I had a few of them in my collection. Also, being on display for all to see, "G" style envelopes look more attractive. The valve was simply triode connected. However, I found gain to be about half compared to my prototype design with the 6AV6. I could have wired the VR100 as a pentode, but triodes give better sound. Maybe the particular VR100 was a bit worn, but when I replaced it with a 6J7, sensitivity became what it should be; about 200mVrms.
The DC feedback is set by the ratio of the 10K and 11K resistors. This is to set the 6CM5 plate current to 45mA with the plate at 240V.
The sound quality from this amplifier was a surprise; it has a nice triode sound reminiscent of my Pulse Counting FM receiver using a 6SN7 output stage. The large Rola speaker transformer also helps the excellent bass response.

Circuit of the tuner/amplifer.

The AM tuner
Anyone who's seen the rest of this site would have worked out that conventional superhets aren't my thing, and so of course a regenerative detector was chosen for the AM receiver. Again, wanting to use a G style octal valve, and knowing it was a good circuit, I used the circuit from Radio & Hobbies, April 1943 called the "Tiny Tim".
This used a 6J7 with potentiometer controlled regeneration. I've never liked the more common (in Australia & the UK) variable condenser control. Apart from needing a bulky, expensive, and now not so obtainable component, the performance is not very good. Backlash is awful and then there's the detuning effect as the regeneration is adjusted.
Potentiometer control has non of these disadvantages. With pentodes, the screen voltage is adjusted to control the gain of the valve and therefore the point at which oscillation almost occurs. For triodes, the plate voltage is adjusted instead. There are various ways of creating the feedback path; usually a third winding on the aerial coil is used. It can be in either the cathode, plate or screen circuit, so long as some of the incoming RF flows through it out of phase. For the Tiny Tim circuit, the screen grid is used as the anode for the feedback winding. Operation is smooth and predictable.
For this project I actually used a 6K7 as it was what was immediately to hand. I didn't find any real difference between it and a 6J7. The difference between these valves is that the 6J7 is sharp cut off and the 6K7 is remote cut off. In theory, a sharp cut off valve is better for this application but the 6K7 works so it stays.
Because of strange loading effects of my long wire aerial, I generally have to place a bit of capacitance in series with the aerial primary in order to get the regeneration to work across the band properly. Hence, the two aerial terminals.
Separate variable condensers are used for the AM and FM sections, and wishing to use only one dial I had to gang them together. This I did by means of dial drums and cord. It worked out very well.

FM Tuner
This one's been covered enough times not to say much further here. It is of course my favourite 12AT7 super regenerative receiver. However, I did use a 6201 valve in place of a 12AT7; it's the industrial version. Initially, the receiver performed poorly with more noise, poor sensitivity and a seemingly impossible to get rid of quench beating problem. It wasn't the 6201 either; I did try a 12AT7 with no improvement. It seemed the quench frequency was too low all the time. Upon replacing the 330K grid resistor with 270K, the performance came up to what I expected it should be. I can only assume that it was a whole lot of component tolerances adding up in the wrong direction. The regeneration control in this receiver is of the later method where no C- supply is required.

Underneath view. Note the two variable condensers ganged together.

Power Supply
A bit different to the average receiver; this uses a power transformer from a Hewlett Packard 715A klystron power supply. With the 6CM5 drawing 1.2A for it's heater, the typical 2A 6.3V winding found on most power transformers would be inadequate. The HP transformer has more than sufficient capacity, spread over three windings, for all the valves. The 5V rectifier heater winding is rated at 3A, so I could use a 5AS4, which looks impressive from its size. One of the reasons why such a valve would be used is that the secondary windings are roughly 480V a side of the centre tap, even though the maximum current available is about 50mA.
So, this extra voltage caused a few problems. With the highest voltage required being about 270V for the output stage, there were a lot of volts to get rid of. 55V is lost across the back bias/ filter resistor. Keep in mind that the DC voltage is the AC multiplied by 1.4142. The problem of dropping such a high voltage at approximately 55mA is the heat from the resistors used. I initially thought a light bulb would be the way to go. As it turned out, a 25W 240V lamp with a 300 ohm 10W resistor in series did the trick, or instead of using the resistor, a 40W lamp was used. Electrically it was a good solution, but the glare from the 25W bulb was just unpleasant coming from the top of the exposed chassis. So I had to go back to using resistors. a 2.2K 50W resistor was installed above chassis with an adjustable 1K 20W to set the B+.
So up to this point we have our required 270V B+ and -55V C-, but what about the warm up? With about 670V on the filter condensers when the unit is first turned on (the 5AS4 is directly heated), it would mean condensers of at least this voltage would have to be installed in all the filtering and decoupling positions. Not convenient, with electros not conveniently available above 450V and also the ceramic condensers used in the receiver sections being typically 400V. So a sort of pre regulator was devised using a 6CG7. Apart from the output stage, all the tuner/amplifier's supplies are derived from this source.  Three series connected neon bulbs limit the voltage on the grid to about 270V and the parallel connected triodes simply function as a cathode follower. Thus the secondary B+ can never go above this voltage. Thinking about this further, I realised the neon bulbs aren't really necessary. By the time the 6CG7 has warmed up, the main B+ will be down to about 270V anyway. Note that the 6CG7 cathodes are connected to the heaters powered from their own isolated winding, this has to be done to prevent the heater - cathode voltage rating being exceeded.
The one other thing that may attract attention, is that looking at the selector switch, it can be seen there's some relatively high value resistors across the B+ contacts. This was done to prevent cathode poisoning of the 12AT7 and 6K7 when either or both were not being used.
Running a valve with the heater powered but no cathode current for extended periods of time is not a good thing to do and results in the cathode being unable to emit electrons.
The voltage fed to the inactive valves is about 30V. Enough for some plate current, but not enough so that particular receiver becomes active. Simply leaving both receivers active and switching the audio only is not good practice as it may be possible to hear program material via stray capacitance or switch leakage.


The first thing evident is the sound quality. It was far better than expected. While a sine wave displayed on a CRO will show any obvious distortion, you really have to hear the amplifier to appreciate it. In this case, the triode sound was plainly obvious. And yes I really do agree that triodes do sound better than pentodes. It is a very noticeable difference.
The bass response was the other surprise, but then using a proper single ended output transformer, with a lot more iron than is typically used, does help. I won't hesitate to use this 6CM5 design in future projects.
For the receivers, the performance is the usual for their designs. The 12AT7 FM receiver, after the change of grid resistor, performs like all the other ones I've built. Sound quality can be very good but in general it isn't something you'd make recordings from.
The 6K7 regenerative detector performs well, with no regeneration control backlash. It's performance is exactly the same as the Tiny Tim that I built up in 1997. In my location most stations receivable on a superhet can be received on a regenerative detector using a long wire aerial.